Saturday, August 29, 2026

The week the market had circled since the July 29 FOMC meeting — the week that would deliver PCE data, NVIDIA earnings, and Kevin Warsh's first speech as Federal Reserve Chair all within 72 hours — delivered three simultaneous resolutions that pulled markets in three different directions: a hawkish Federal Reserve Chair whose first Jackson Hole keynote moved September rate-hike probability 24 percentage points higher in a single Friday afternoon; a geopolitical deal that removed $5 from Brent crude in 48 hours, erasing the oil-risk premium built over the prior two weeks and closing the warflation trade's best month in a single session; and an NVIDIA earnings report so large that it rendered every prior AI revenue benchmark obsolete — $96.2 billion in quarterly revenue, up 106% year-over-year and 18% sequentially, with Data Center revenue alone at $89 billion and Q3 FY2027 guidance of $108 billion (4% above the $103.8 billion street consensus) — a print that caused the stock to surge approximately 9% on Thursday August 27 as investors processed the magnitude of the beat, then fall 4.57% on Friday August 28 as Kevin Warsh delivered his verdict at Jackson Hole, making the week's defining image not a victorious AI giant but a company that reported the most revenue in the history of the semiconductor industry and still ended the week below its prior Friday close. The macroeconomic confirmation arrived Wednesday August 26: July PCE came in at 3.7% year-over-year on the headline (above the 3.6% consensus), 0.2% month-over-month (well above the 0.07% consensus forecast), and core PCE at 3.3% year-over-year — in-line with consensus but confirming that headline inflation remains sticky enough to justify the explicit hawkish language Warsh chose for his Friday morning keynote: "inflation is still too high," "we may have to raise interest rates in the coming months," and Warsh signaled that interest rate increases are in play if inflation does not fall — a sentence-by-sentence escalation of Fed communication that sent the two-year Treasury yield up approximately 6–8 basis points to approximately 4.30–4.31% and moved the September FOMC hike probability from approximately 35% to approximately 56% per CME Group FedWatch data within hours of the speech's conclusion. Against that backdrop, the Iran-Oman joint maritime corridor announcement on August 25 — establishing agreed geographic coordinates for inbound and outbound Hormuz shipping routes, a joint coordination center, and a revenue-sharing framework — sent Brent crude from $93.40 (the prior Friday's close) to $88.29 (Friday August 28 close), a 5.47% decline that not only ended the warflation trade's seven-week ascent but illustrated the speed asymmetry that defines geopolitical risk in commodity markets: the same premium that takes months to build can partially dismantle in 48 hours when diplomacy moves faster than the risk models that priced it. Salesforce provided the week's secondary earnings detonation Wednesday August 26 AH alongside NVIDIA — adjusted EPS meaningfully above consensus, revenue of $11.35 billion, free cash flow up 81% year-over-year, Agentforce ARR reaching $1.5 billion with triple-digit booking growth, and the announcement of Claudeforce: a strategic partnership with Anthropic that makes Claude the default reasoning model across the entire Salesforce platform including the Atlas Reasoning Engine, Agentforce Coworker, and Slack, representing the most consequential enterprise AI platform deployment since Microsoft embedded OpenAI's models into Office 365; CRM surged 12.68% in after-hours trading on the combination. The consumer earnings of the week confirmed the K-shaped spending environment in its sharpest single-week illustration of 2026: Dick's Sporting Goods approximately -30% on a guidance cut from $14.20 analyst consensus to $11.00–$12.00 (Foot Locker segment comparable sales -3.6% dragging the combined entity); Dollar General +5% on comparable-store sales +3.5% and raised full-year guidance; Best Buy -4.4% despite beating on adjusted EPS ($1.48 vs $1.37 estimate) and comparable sales (+4.1%) as margin-pressure concerns overwhelmed the top-line strength. The S&P 500 gained 0.49% for the week (7,674.37 → 7,711.76), the Nasdaq 0.85% (26,180.46 → 26,402.42), the Dow 0.53% (53,277.01 → 53,559.99) — the first winning week for all three major indices since the three-week streak ended on August 21 — but the Russell 2000's -1.47% weekly decline to 2,972 told the more precise story: the market that gained was the market of NVIDIA on Thursday and Salesforce after hours; the market that lost was every rate-sensitive, small-cap, and energy position that had defined the prior month's rotation.

Week in Review

The Numbers

*YTD figures computed by compounding prior reported YTD returns with the week's confirmed move; not independently re-sourced for this report. Weekly % reflects the prior Friday (August 21) close to this Friday's (August 28) close: S&P 500 from 7,674.37, Nasdaq from 26,180.46, Dow from 53,277.01, Russell 2000 from 3,016.85.

The Story Arc

Monday August 24 opened with oil markets trading lower as geopolitical risk sentiment shifted ahead of a week expected to bring diplomatic developments in the Hormuz standoff. Brent crude fell approximately 2.5% to $92.06 — the sharpest single-day oil decline in three weeks — as traders priced out a portion of the war-risk premium accumulated through the IRGC appointment and the Minoan Dignity attack. The broader equity market opened cautiously: the S&P 500 moved in a narrow range, with investors unwilling to make directional bets ahead of Wednesday's triple data release (PCE, GDP, durable goods) and NVIDIA's after-hours report.

Tuesday August 25 brought the week's most consequential geopolitical development alongside two key data releases. Oman's Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi arrived in Tehran for talks with Iranian FM Araghchi; the two sides announced agreement on the geographic coordinates of a "temporary joint maritime corridor" through the Strait of Hormuz, establishing inbound and outbound shipping routes through Omani and Iranian waters, a joint coordination center to manage vessel traffic, and a revenue-sharing framework. The announcement — with the joint statement confirmed and extended through Wednesday August 26 — sent Brent toward $88.29 over the course of the week as traders priced out a portion of the war-risk premium. The caveat embedded in the announcement — that the corridor would not fully open until the United States fulfilled its commitments under the June interim peace deal — would prove consequential throughout the week. On the macro front, Tuesday also delivered two data releases that reinforced the week's theme of hard-data strength coexisting with soft-data pessimism. The Conference Board's August Consumer Confidence reading came in at 89.4 — a seven-month low and below the prior month's 90.2 — driven almost entirely by the Expectations sub-index collapsing to 68.2 (down 5.8 points from July), even as the Present Situation index rose to 121.2 (up 6.8 points), the highest level since May 2026. The divergence is interpretive gold: what consumers say they expect in the next six months (deeply pessimistic at 68.2) is disconnected from what they actually observe about their current situation (resilient at 121.2) — a split that maps precisely onto the oil-inflation dynamic where gas prices at the pump create sentiment damage while the job market and wage structure remain intact. S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller released the June 2026 home price index on the same morning: the national composite rose 1.5% year-over-year (up from 1.2% in May), the 10-city composite rose 2.9% (up from 2.4%). Chicago led all markets at +6.9% year-over-year; Seattle was the weakest at -2.0%. The subtler reading: with June inflation at approximately 3.5%, home prices are rising 1.5% nominally but falling in real terms — the thirteenth consecutive month of real-terms housing price decline. Dick's Sporting Goods reported Q2 2026 results Tuesday morning: adjusted EPS of $3.53 against the $3.78 consensus estimate, revenue of $5.59 billion against the $5.65 billion estimate, and a full-year adjusted EPS guidance cut from the prior analyst consensus of $14.20 to $11.00–$12.00 — a $2–$3 per share downward revision that sent DKS shares down approximately 30% (closing at approximately $124.31, the company's worst single-day stock decline on record). The driver was the recently-acquired Foot Locker segment, which posted comparable sales of -3.6%, substantially worse than the core Dick's business (+4.9% comps), as the athletic footwear marketplace deteriorated under promotional pressure. The contrast with Dollar General — which reported Thursday August 27 with comparable sales +3.5% — could not have been sharper: the consumer trading up to premium athletic footwear is pulling back; the consumer finding value at dollar stores is accelerating.

Wednesday August 26 was the week's data apex. At 8:30 AM ET, the Bureau of Economic Analysis released three simultaneous reports: July PCE inflation came in at 3.7% year-over-year headline (above the 3.6% consensus) and 0.2% month-over-month (above the 0.07% consensus forecast), with core PCE at 3.3% year-over-year (in-line) and 0.2% month-over-month; the Q2 2026 GDP second estimate was unchanged at 1.5% annualized (consumer spending revised up to 3.4% from 3.2%, largely offsetting minor other revisions); and durable goods orders for July rose +1.1% (above the +0.5% consensus), though ex-transportation the reading was +0.4%, below the +0.6% estimate. The headline PCE beat was the single most important number of the morning: it confirmed that the three FOMC dissenters who argued at the July 29 meeting that inflation remained "too high" to wait had not been operating on theoretical hawkishness but on data that the headline CPI progress had partially obscured. The Treasury market moved modestly: the 10-year yield edged up to approximately 4.65%, the 2-year edged higher but was little changed on the day as PCE was broadly in-line on the core reading. The equity market dipped on the open but stabilized as investors processed the GDP revision (consumer spending is solid) alongside the inflation data (headline PCE is above consensus but core is in-line). After hours Wednesday, the day's two most consequential earnings reports arrived within minutes of each other. NVIDIA reported Q2 FY2027 results: revenue of $96.221 billion, up 106% year-over-year and 18% sequentially, against guidance of approximately $91 billion and a street consensus of approximately $92 billion; Data Center revenue of $89.0 billion, up 117% year-over-year; gross margin of 75.0% (GAAP and non-GAAP); non-GAAP EPS of $2.22 against expectations; and Q3 FY2027 revenue guidance of $108.0 billion, 4.0% above the $103.8 billion street consensus — a guidance raise that forced analyst FY2027 revenue revisions upward within hours. Simultaneously, Salesforce reported Q2 FY2027 results: revenue of $11.35 billion (+11% year-over-year, in-line), adjusted EPS of $5.90 (a large beat driven by operating leverage and Agentforce monetization), free cash flow up 81% year-over-year, Agentforce ARR of $1.5 billion with triple-digit booking growth, a raised FY2027 revenue guide to $46.1–$46.4 billion, and the announcement of Claudeforce — a strategic partnership with Anthropic placing Claude as the default AI reasoning model across the Salesforce platform. CRM surged 12.68% in after-hours trading. NVDA rose approximately 4.7% in the initial after-hours session Wednesday August 26 as the magnitude of the revenue and guidance beat was absorbed.

Thursday August 27 opened with NVIDIA shares gapping sharply higher as the full $96.2 billion revenue print and the $108 billion Q3 guide circulated through the morning research notes of banks that had been modeling $92–$94 billion. NVDA rose approximately 9% during Thursday's session, closing at approximately $227.98. The broader market tracked the NVIDIA surge: the S&P 500 rose, tech-heavy Nasdaq outperformed, and the AI supply-chain names (AMD, Marvell, Broadcom) all gained sympathetically. Weekly jobless claims for the week ending August 22 came in at 203,000 — down 4,000 from the prior week's 207,000, below consensus, and near the mid-year lows — confirming that the labor market tightness that the FOMC dissenters had cited in their hawkish July dissent had not relented. Dollar General reported Q2 2026 results Thursday morning: net sales of $11.29 billion (+5.2%), same-store sales +3.5% (driven by 2.0% traffic increase and 1.5% higher average transaction), diluted EPS of $2.48 (up from $1.86 the prior year, +33.3% year-over-year), and raised full-year guidance — DG rose 5% on the combination. Best Buy also reported Thursday: adjusted EPS of $1.48 against the $1.37 consensus estimate (+8%), revenue of $9.78 billion against the $9.56 billion estimate, and comparable sales of +4.1% against +1.6% the prior year. But Best Buy fell 4.4% to $83.56 as the market focused on margin pressure: operating expenses rose as the company invested in its service capabilities, and the forward margin trajectory was seen as less attractive than the top-line beat implied. Jackson Hole began Thursday August 27 with preparatory sessions; the market-moving speech was scheduled for Friday morning. The Thursday session's positioning reflected the dual anticipation: investors who had de-risked ahead of the Warsh speech began partially rebuilding exposure on the NVIDIA-driven confidence, but the PCE beat from Wednesday created a firm ceiling on rate-sensitive equity rallies.

Friday August 28 delivered the week's resolution. At approximately 10:00 AM ET, Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh took the podium at the Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium and delivered his first major policy address as Chair — a speech that had been the most anticipated Fed communication event of 2026. Warsh's language was unambiguously hawkish: he stated that "inflation is still too high," that the Fed "may have to raise interest rates in the coming months to bring it down," and signaled that interest rate increases are in play if inflation does not fall. He described the July PCE reading (released Wednesday) as evidence that "underlying trends have not meaningfully improved" despite recent cooling, and offered a more hawkish reading of inflation than the July FOMC meeting's majority statement had conveyed. The two-year Treasury yield rose approximately 6–8 basis points to approximately 4.30–4.31% on the speech; the US dollar gained approximately 0.3%; and per CME Group FedWatch data, the probability of a September FOMC rate hike jumped from approximately 35% (where it had stood entering the week) to approximately 56% — an approximately 20-percentage-point move in a single afternoon. NVIDIA fell 4.57% on Friday, closing at $217.55, as the rate-hike probability surge compressed technology multiples. Oil continued lower: WTI fell toward $82.82, Brent toward $88.29, as the Iran-Oman corridor announcement accumulated market acceptance through the week. Gold held above $4,600, gaining approximately 0.4% to approximately $4,608 for the week — extending its winning streak to a sixth consecutive week even as the dollar strengthened on Warsh's hawkish speech and the Iran-Oman deal partially reduced the geopolitical support pillar. The S&P 500 fell 0.25% on Friday, the Nasdaq 0.52%, the Dow essentially flat — snapping the NVIDIA-driven Thursday gains but not reversing the week's modest gains entirely.

The week's narrative: A week that opened with the oil market pricing partial peace and closed with the bond market pricing a September hike. NVIDIA reported its most consequential earnings in the company's history and ended the week lower than it started. Salesforce announced the most significant enterprise AI platform deal of the year and rose 12.68% in after-hours — the kind of multi-sigma beat that deserves a full market session's worth of re-rating. The consumer remained bifurcated: dollar stores gaining traffic, sporting goods and footwear losing it. And Kevin Warsh, who had spent fifteen years away from the Fed with a mixed record of hawkish and notably dovish op-eds before returning as Chair, demonstrated at his first Jackson Hole that he would not allow his initial speech to be misread as dovish simply by its silence — he said the words, explicitly, that moved the market.

Biggest Movers

Winners

Losers

Market Scoreboard

Weekly Index Performance

Note: Nikkei prior close from the August 21 close reported in last week's report (~66,016). Nikkei this-week close of approximately 66,405 sourced from STL News overseas markets summary for August 28, 2026. KOSPI prior close 6,912.95 per Korea Economic Daily; KOSPI close of 6,788.88 confirmed via multiple Asian market data sources. Hang Seng 25,566 confirmed via 247wallst market bell data for August 28, 2026.

The Russell 2000's -1.47% weekly decline is the most structurally significant move of the week. The Russell entering the week at 3,016 — near its August all-time record — was the market's purest expression of the rate-hold trade: small caps borrow more in floating-rate instruments, benefit most from lower rates, and are most exposed to a rate hike. When Warsh moved September hike probability from approximately 35% to approximately 56% in a single Friday-morning speech, he mathematically changed the expected financing cost for the 2,000 small companies in the index. An approximately 56% probability of a 25-basis-point hike in September means that money markets are pricing an expected rate increase of 0.56 × 0.25% = approximately 14 basis points above the current rate. For smaller companies in the Russell with significant floating-rate debt, that 14-basis-point move translates directly into higher interest expense. The Russell's -1.47% decline is the market's collective discount of that incremental financing cost across 2,000 balance sheets simultaneously. Relevant: small_cap_value, fomc_announcement.

The Nasdaq's +0.85% weekly gain masks a tale of two sessions. On Thursday August 27, the Nasdaq likely gained 1.5–2.5% on NVIDIA's 9% surge and Salesforce's AH enthusiasm. On Friday August 28, the Nasdaq fell 0.52% on Warsh's hawkish speech and NVDA's -4.57% reversal. The net +0.85% for the week represents the Thursday AI-earnings gain minus the Friday rate-hike compression. This bifurcation is not new — it has defined 2026's Nasdaq throughout: AI earnings strength competing against rising discount rates for long-duration technology cash flows. What is new this week is that the pattern reached NVIDIA itself: the company that had previously avoided the beat-but-fell dynamic (even as Cisco, AMAT, AMD, and Datadog fell on their respective beats) finally experienced the same post-announcement reversal that has characterized the broader tech earnings season. Relevant: ai_infra_picks_shovels, nvidia_supply_chain.

The S&P 500's +0.49% gain, combined with Russell's -1.47%, represents a 196-basis-point large-cap / small-cap performance spread in a single week. The widening of this spread — which had briefly compressed the prior week as rate-hold optimism peaked — is the clearest market signal that Warsh's Jackson Hole speech was received as substantively hawkish rather than performatively so. When the Fed Chair is hawkish in a way the market believes, the spread between large-cap earnings-driven equities (which can absorb rate hikes through strong balance sheets) and small-cap floating-rate borrowers (who cannot) widens in real time. The 196-basis-point spread in one week is the bond market's message, transmitted through the equity markets. Relevant: growth_concentration, multi_factor_smart_beta.

Commodities & Rates

WTI and Brent prior closes from last week's report (August 21). WTI prior close ~$86.30 per HDFC Sky; August 28 close of $82.82 and Brent $88.29 sourced from Trading Economics and multiple commodity data providers. Gold prior close ~$4,589 per USAGOLD and last week's report; August 28 close approximately $4,608, holding above $4,600 per USAGOLD and Yahoo Finance. Bitcoin prior close from last week's report (~$76,943); August 28 close ~$79,550 per CoinDesk and Fortune. 2Y Treasury prior close estimated at approximately 4.23% (inferred from pre-Jackson Hole positioning); August 28 close 4.32% confirmed from CNBC (+9 bps weekly). 10Y Treasury 4.72% confirmed; 30Y approximately 5.20% (bear flattening: short rates rose faster than long rates on September hike pricing; 30Y approximately -2 bps on the week).

Oil's -5.47% weekly decline (Brent $93.40 → $88.29) is the week's most dramatic reversal and the most consequential single-week move for portfolio positioning since the warflation trade began in March 2026. The catalyst was the Iran-Oman joint maritime corridor announcement: agreed geographic coordinates, a joint coordination center, and a revenue-sharing framework — the most concrete Hormuz diplomacy since the US-Iran MOU expired August 17. The oil market priced out approximately $5 of the war-risk premium that had accumulated through the IRGC appointment (prior week) and the Minoan Dignity attack (week of August 18). The critical nuance: Brent at $88.29 is still approximately $18 above the pre-conflict 2025 average of approximately $70, implying the market has priced out only roughly 20–25% of the total war premium accumulated since February 28. What the market did not price out was the conditionality embedded in the Iran-Oman deal: the corridor does not fully open until the United States fulfills its commitments under the June interim agreement — a condition whose satisfaction under the Trump administration remains uncertain. War-risk insurance clauses in tanker contracts (which typically have six-month tails) will not compress immediately even if diplomatic progress accelerates; Lloyd's War Risks Pool and the Joint War Committee continue to assess Hormuz as a "listed area" for elevated premiums until a formal standing agreement replaces the temporary corridor. The $88 floor is not peace pricing — it is partial-diplomacy pricing. Relevant: warflation_hedge, geopolitical_crisis.

Gold's modest weekly gain (~$4,589 → ~$4,608, approximately +0.4%) extended the winning streak to a sixth consecutive week despite simultaneous headwinds from a hawkish Fed Chair and a geopolitical deal that partially compressed oil-risk premium. The resilience reflected the ongoing support from the fiscal-excess pillar (US national debt at $40 trillion, Treasury bond buybacks at $4 billion per session) even as two of gold's three support pillars were tested this week: pillar 2 (the rate-hold thesis) was inverted by Warsh's hawkish speech (rate-hike thesis now at approximately 56% for September), and pillar 1 (geopolitical premium) was partially reduced by the Iran-Oman corridor announcement. That gold held above $4,600 and finished modestly higher despite the dollar gaining approximately 0.3% on Friday August 28 alone suggests residual geopolitical and fiscal support remains intact. Gold at approximately $4,608 remains approximately $989 below its all-time high of $5,597.23 (January 29, 2026). A Fed rate hike in September — if September hike probability at approximately 56% is realized — would add further pressure to gold's second-half positioning. Relevant: gold_bug, permanent_portfolio.

Bitcoin's +3.4% weekly move to approximately $79,550 is a stronger-than-expected performance given the hawkish macro backdrop. Bitcoin had been the prior week's standout (+22%, best since March 2024), driven by Treasury bond-buyback dynamics and the $40 trillion national debt milestone. This week, Bitcoin held above $79,000 even as the dollar strengthened approximately 0.3% on Warsh's hawkish speech (historically negative for Bitcoin) and September hike probability moved to approximately 56% per CME FedWatch. The fiscal-excess narrative (US national debt, $4B/session bond buybacks) continued providing independent crypto demand that is not simply a dollar-inverse trade. Bitcoin remains well below its 2026 high of approximately $97,000 (January 14) and its all-time high of $126,198 (October 2025). Relevant: crypto_ecosystem.

The yield curve's bear-flattening move this week — 2-year +9 basis points to 4.32% (weekly), 10-year +1 basis point to 4.72%, 30-year approximately -2 basis points to 5.20% — is the most specific signal the bond market sent about what Warsh's Jackson Hole speech meant for policy expectations. Bear flattening (short rates rising faster than long rates) occurs when the market believes the Fed will hike in the near term to address inflation, while simultaneously believing the hiking cycle will successfully control inflation and prevent long-run inflation expectations from becoming unanchored. The 2-year at 4.32% is consistent with approximately 56% probability of a 25-basis-point hike in September (per CME FedWatch data). The 30-year at 5.20% is slightly below the 5.31% intraday high from the prior week's FOMC minutes reaction — suggesting the bond market interprets an active hiking cycle as ultimately more deflationary than the rate-hold scenario would be, at least over the 30-year horizon. The spread between the 10-year (4.72%) and the 2-year (4.32%) is +40 basis points, as the curve has un-inverted from the 2024–2025 inversion. Relevant: bond_duration_trade, yield_curve_inversion.

Earnings Recap

The AI Apex and the K-Shaped Consumer

NVIDIA's $96.2 billion revenue quarter — the most consequential single earnings event of 2026 — is also the most complete illustration of why earnings magnitude and stock performance do not have a linear relationship at the outer extremes of market expectation. The $96.221 billion figure represents a 106% year-over-year increase at a quarterly revenue scale that exceeds the annual GDP of some G20 economies; the Data Center segment alone, at $89.0 billion, represents more quarterly output than many S&P 500 components generate in an entire year. The Q3 guidance of $108 billion — $4.2 billion above the prior street consensus — forced a ratchet upward in sell-side FY2027 models that is now visible in the revised consensus trajectories. None of this is in dispute. What happened to the stock — up 9% on Thursday as the magnitude of the print was absorbed, down 4.57% on Friday as the magnitude of Kevin Warsh's hawkish speech was absorbed — is also not in dispute. The two events are causally linked through the discount rate: a September rate hike probability of approximately 56% means the denominator in every DCF model applied to a company with $108 billion in quarterly revenue and a forward P/E of approximately 24–27× just moved materially upward. NVIDIA's stock at the prior Friday's close of approximately $228 was already embedding an expectation of continued revenue acceleration; the question that Friday's fall answered is not "did NVIDIA beat?" but "what is the appropriate multiple for a company generating $400+ billion in annualized revenue at 75% gross margins in a rising-rate environment where the risk-free rate on the 2-year is 4.32%?" The market's provisional answer, at $217.55, reflects a recalibrated multiple appropriate to a rising-rate environment. Relevant: nvidia_supply_chain, ai_infra_picks_shovels, picks_and_shovels_ai.

Salesforce's Claudeforce partnership with Anthropic is the week's most strategically significant corporate announcement outside of NVIDIA's earnings, and its implications extend well beyond Salesforce's $12.68% after-hours gain. The commercial terms of the partnership — Claude designated as the default reasoning model for the Atlas Reasoning Engine, Agentforce Coworker, and Slack; "Salesforce in Claude" as a plugin with 37 prebuilt sales skills enabling live Salesforce data access and workflow execution directly from Claude — represent the first case where an enterprise software company of Salesforce's scale (largest CRM platform globally, serving approximately 150,000 businesses) has made a single AI model the foundational reasoning layer across its entire product surface. The prior analogues (Microsoft's OpenAI integration into Office 365, Google's Gemini integration into Workspace) are broader in user reach but more shallow in integration depth; Claudeforce is narrower in user reach but deep enough that Claude can execute governed actions inside Salesforce data, not merely generate text about it. The revenue mechanics: Salesforce's Agentforce ARR reached $1.5 billion this quarter with triple-digit booking growth. If Claude-powered Agentforce workflows drive additional Agentforce seat expansion — which the Claudeforce deal is designed to do — then Anthropic gains an enterprise distribution channel that rivals what any direct enterprise sales organization could create, and Salesforce gains an AI reasoning capability that would otherwise require building or acquiring at significant cost. The Claudeforce announcement arrived alongside an EPS beat and a revenue guidance raise — making it impossible for investors to separate the earnings quality from the partnership excitement in the AH price action. Relevant: anthropic_ecosystem, ai_application_survivors, subscription_monopoly.

Dick's Sporting Goods' approximately -30% decline versus Dollar General's +5% gain in the same week, read in sequence with Tuesday's DKS report and Dollar General's Thursday results, is the K-shaped consumer thesis in its most concrete single-week form. Dick's Sporting Goods acquired Foot Locker in late 2025 to expand its premium athletic footwear exposure, betting that the consumer who buys a $200 Nike shoe at a mall Foot Locker is the same consumer who will sustain discretionary spending in a high-inflation environment. The Q2 2026 result challenged that thesis directly: the Foot Locker segment posted -3.6% comparable sales, while the core Dick's business posted +4.9% — a 860-basis-point divergence between the premium-footwear consumer (contracting) and the sporting goods and fitness consumer (expanding). The guidance cut from $14.20 consensus to $11.00–$12.00 is not a rounding error; it is a $2–$3 per-share admission that the Foot Locker integration's near-term financial assumptions were built for a consumer that no longer exists in the numbers. Dollar General's +3.5% same-store sales growth in the same week — driven by 2.0% traffic growth, not just basket inflation — describes the consumer who has given up the premium athletic footwear trip entirely and is now shopping for the same value that Dollar General provides in every other category. The two stocks, in the same week, are not just earnings reports; they are a consumer spending map. Relevant: k_shape_economy, consumer_credit_stress, pawn_counter_cyclical.

Geopolitical Update

Iran-Oman Hormuz Corridor: The First Deal Structure Since the MOU Expired

The most consequential geopolitical development of the week was announced Tuesday–Wednesday August 25–26, following talks between Oman's FM Badr Albusaidi and Iranian FM Araghchi in Tehran: Iran and Oman reached agreement on a "temporary joint maritime corridor" in the Strait of Hormuz. The terms, confirmed by Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, included agreed geographic coordinates for inbound and outbound shipping routes passing through both Omani and Iranian waters (departing from the prior system of routing exclusively through Omani waters), a joint maritime coordination center to manage vessel information and traffic, and a revenue-sharing framework — the first bilateral operational arrangement for Hormuz shipping since the US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding signed June 17 expired without renewal on August 17.

The market's immediate read — Brent crude -2.5% on Monday August 24, extending to a -5.47% weekly decline — reflected a partial pricing-out of the war-risk premium. The critical condition embedded in the Iranian announcement was less immediately priced: the corridor would not become fully operational until "the United States fulfills its commitments" under the June interim peace deal. What those commitments entail — presumably some combination of sanctions relief, military posture adjustments in the Gulf, and diplomatic recognition of the interim framework — remains publicly ambiguous. Under the current Trump administration, which had threatened Oman over its mediating role as recently as August 17, the timeline for US compliance is uncertain. Al Jazeera's analysis, citing Hormuz specialist sources, described the Iran-Oman corridor as establishing the "what" (geographic routing) while leaving the "when" (operational activation) dependent on a US political decision that has no stated timeline.

The oil market's residual pricing — Brent at $88.29 rather than the pre-conflict average of approximately $70 — reflects the market's assessment that this conditionality is real: approximately 75–80% of the war-risk premium accumulated since February 28 remains priced in despite the deal. Tanker insurance markets confirm this interpretation: Lloyd's War Risks Pool continues to classify the Strait of Hormuz as a "listed area" for elevated premiums, a designation that typically requires a formal and fully operational agreement — not a conditional corridor announcement — to remove. War risk clauses in tanker charter agreements, which typically have six-month contract tails, will not immediately compress even if ships begin transiting the corridor next week. The operational gap between "announced corridor" and "insurable route at normal premium" is where the remaining $18/bbl premium lives. Relevant: warflation_hedge, geopolitical_crisis, commodity_supercycle.

Warsh at Jackson Hole: The Hawk Identifies Himself

Kevin Warsh's August 28 keynote at the Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium resolved the market's speculation about how a chair known for hawkish instincts would communicate in his first major speech as Federal Reserve Chair. The answer was: clearly and directly. Warsh stated that "inflation is still too high," that the Fed "may have to raise interest rates in the coming months to bring it down," and signaled that interest rate increases are in play if inflation does not fall. He described the July PCE reading (released Wednesday August 26) as evidence that "underlying trends have not meaningfully improved" despite recent cooling, and offered a reading of inflation that was more hawkish than the July FOMC meeting's majority statement had conveyed.

Three aspects of the speech warrant specific attention. First, Warsh did not say "September is a live meeting" — the explicit formulation that would have been most unambiguous in signaling imminent action — but the combination of "may have to raise rates in the coming months" and "increases are in play" was decoded by the market as functionally equivalent. The CME Group FedWatch September hike probability moved from approximately 35% to approximately 56% not because Warsh announced a hike, but because his language established a clear asymmetry: an incoming data miss (NFP or September PCE below consensus) would keep rates on hold, but an inline or above-consensus reading would justify the increase he has now explicitly signaled the Committee is willing to make.

Second, Warsh's explicit acknowledgment that he is "impressed by the overall performance of the US economy" and cited 20% S&P 500 profit growth over the past year suggests he does not believe the economy is fragile enough to preclude a hike — the growth-fragility argument that September-hold advocates have relied upon. A Fed Chair who believes the economy is strong enough to absorb a hike, and who explicitly says inflation is too high, is a Fed Chair who has pre-cleared the intellectual ground for a September move.

Third, the speech arrived two days after PCE data that gave Warsh the factual basis for his language. July PCE headline at 3.7% year-over-year (above the 3.6% consensus) and month-over-month at 0.2% (above the 0.07% consensus forecast) was not a blowout miss — but it was a miss in the direction that validated the three dissenters' case. Warsh's use of this data in his speech established a direct data-to-communication pipeline that markets had wondered whether a new Fed Chair would employ at his inaugural Jackson Hole. He did. The September 16 FOMC meeting now begins with an approximately 56% hike probability and a Chair who has publicly pre-committed to the conditions under which a hike is warranted. Relevant: fomc_announcement, bond_duration_trade, yield_curve_inversion.

Strategy Scorecard

Winners

Mixed

Losers

MVP of the Week

k_shape_economy — Dick's Sporting Goods' approximately -30% guidance cut and Dollar General's +5% beat in the same week, read together with the Walmart US comps miss (+2.6% vs. +3.8% consensus) and Target's +4% outperformance (reported earlier in August), have now assembled the clearest four-company data set of the K-shaped consumer thesis in 2026. The thesis is not that "consumers are weak" — it is that consumers are not a single entity with a single spending trajectory, but two populations with diverging trajectories: the premium aspirational consumer (Foot Locker -3.6% comp, discretionary sporting goods declining) and the value essential consumer (Dollar General SSS +3.5%, traffic +2.0%). The MVP designation reflects the cumulative validation of a thesis across four distinct companies in different subsectors of consumer retail. The K-shaped consumer divergence was already in evidence by Q4 FY2025 earnings in January 2026; premium revenue definitively surpassed economy in dollar terms at Delta Air Lines in Q2 2026 (reported July 2026). Investors now have a multi-month, multi-company data trail confirming the bifurcation in apparel, sporting goods, general merchandise, and dollar stores. The portfolio implication: overweight value-channel consumer exposure, underweight premium discretionary exposure, regardless of the overall consumer confidence reading — which, at 89.4, conflates both populations in a single number that obscures the divergence.

Next Week Preview: August 31 – September 4, 2026

Economic Calendar

Earnings (Key)

Political / Central Bank

Geopolitical Watchlist

• Iran-Oman Corridor Conditionality: The temporary joint maritime corridor announced August 25-26 is not operational until the US fulfills its June interim deal commitments. Watch for any Trump administration statement on compliance — a positive statement would send Brent -$5 to -$8; a negative statement or silence would send it back toward $92-$95.
• August NFP as the Warsh Speech Test (Sep 4): Warsh's explicit Jackson Hole language is now on record; the August NFP will either validate or undermine it. If the DOGE paradox repeats (government job losses reduce headline NFP while private-sector adds remain positive and unemployment falls), the market will face another interpretive challenge: a "weak" headline that validates rate-hold optics but "tight" labor market fundamentals that validate Warsh's hawkish case.
• Hormuz Shipping Attacks: Despite the Iran-Oman corridor announcement, the IRGC's prior statements maintaining a hardline posture on Hormuz reopening conditions remain in effect alongside the diplomatic track. A new attack on a Hormuz vessel this week would immediately reverse 60-70% of the corridor deal's oil-price impact — sending Brent back to $92-$95 and restoring the warflation premium in a single session.
• September FOMC Prep (Sep 4 onwards): Following the August NFP, the Fed enters its pre-meeting blackout period. Warsh's Jackson Hole language is the Committee's last major public communication before that blackout. The market will spend the two weeks between NFP and September 16 pricing just two scenarios: hike (approximately 56% entering the week, moving up or down based on NFP) or hold (approximately 44%).

Monday Setup

Scenario A: NFP weak, Warsh language softens at blackout, oil corridor operational (~20% probability)

August NFP (releasing Friday September 4) comes in at or below +30,000 private-sector payrolls, driven by another DOGE-effect government job reduction, with wage growth softening to +2.8% year-over-year. The weak headline — combined with the Thursday September 3 jobless claims remaining near 200,000 — creates the DOGE paradox again: headline NFP weak but unemployment rate falls further (to 4.0%), creating an ambiguous labor market signal. The Iranian and US governments signal progress on the June interim deal commitments; oil moves toward $84–$85 Brent. In this scenario, Warsh's September 16 FOMC language options narrow: his Jackson Hole speech signaled increases are in play if inflation does not fall — if NFP is weak enough to signal labor market loosening, the "data-dependent" cover to hold is available without contradicting the Jackson Hole speech. September hike probability falls from approximately 56% to 35–40%. Action: restore small_cap_value to full weight on NFP weakness; reduce bond_duration_trade short-duration hedge as rate-hold probability rebounds; add warflation_hedge reduction to 8% if Brent breaks below $85 on Iran corridor progress; restore gold_bug to 13% if dollar weakens on rate-hold reversal; S&P 500 targets 7,850–7,950 range.

Scenario B: NFP moderate, September hike probability stabilizes at 55–65%, oil holds $86–$90 Brent (~50% probability)

August NFP comes in at +80,000–+120,000 private-sector payrolls with wage growth of approximately +3.2% — strong enough to validate Warsh's "labor market tighter than it appears" characterization but not strong enough to trigger an emergency re-pricing. September hike probability consolidates in the 55–65% range — a genuine coin-flip entering the September 16 meeting. Oil consolidates in the $86–$90 Brent range as the Iran-Oman corridor's conditionality prevents full premium compression. Equity markets trade in a narrow range (S&P 500 7,650–7,800) with high dispersion between AI/software names (Salesforce remaining elevated) and rate-sensitive sectors (utilities, small caps, REITs under pressure). Bitcoin holds $75,000–$80,000 as the fiscal-excess narrative persists without the dollar-weakness amplifier. Action: maintain warflation_hedge at 8–10% (reduced from 12–14% prior); hold fomc_announcement neutral through September 16; maintain anthropic_ecosystem at full weight (Claudeforce partnership is multi-year independent of rate cycle); hold small_cap_value at 60% weight through the September 16 decision; cash at 12–15%.

Scenario C: NFP strong, September hike 80%+, Hormuz attack reverses oil corridor gains (~30% probability)

August NFP comes in at +170,000–+200,000 private-sector payrolls with wage growth of +3.7% or higher — a labor market that validates every element of Warsh's Jackson Hole case: "inflation too high," "labor market tighter than it appears," and increases in play. September hike probability jumps from approximately 56% to 80%+, making the September 16 FOMC effectively a pre-committed hike. A new Hormuz attack during the week reverses the oil corridor gains: Brent spikes from $88 back toward $93–$95 as the IRGC demonstrates that the "temporary corridor" does not restrain kinetic activity on parallel tracks. The combined shock — credible September hike + renewed Hormuz risk + strong labor data (dollar-positive) — sends S&P 500 down 2–4%, Nasdaq -3–5%, Russell -3–4%, gold -4–6%, and 10-year yields testing 4.90%. Action: raise cash to 20–25%; restore warflation_hedge to 12–14% on Hormuz attack news; shift to defensive_rotation (utilities, staples, healthcare); reduce ai_infra_picks_shovels to 60% weight (NVIDIA's -4.57% Friday shows rate-sensitivity even at $96B revenue); add treasury_safe short-duration position; hold anthropic_ecosystem (rate-insensitive platform partnership).

Position Sizing

• Warflation hedge (warflation_hedge): reduce to 8–10% from 12–14%; the Iran-Oman corridor removed 20–25% of the war premium; the remaining 75–80% of the premium persists on conditionality and insurance-tail mechanics; restore to 12–14% only if a Hormuz attack occurs or the US explicitly rejects the June interim deal conditions
• Rate uncertainty (fomc_announcement): short-side lean through September 16; the September hike at approximately 56% probability is the new neutral; the coin-flip has resolved hawkish and the August NFP will set the final direction
• Gold (gold_bug): 10% (reduced from 15%); two of three support pillars weakened this week; restore to 13% if NFP is weak and rate-hold probability rebounds; restore to 15% only if both the Hormuz deal reverses AND the September hike is called off
• Small caps (small_cap_value): 60% of prior weight through September 16 FOMC; restore fully on a confirmed rate-hold; reduce further to 40% on a confirmed September hike and above-consensus NFP
• AI infrastructure (ai_infra_picks_shovels): hold at full weight; NVIDIA's $96.2B revenue and $108B Q3 guide validates the demand cycle regardless of the stock's Friday reversal; the thesis is about demand, not the stock price at any given 35× multiple
• Anthropic/enterprise AI (anthropic_ecosystem, ai_application_survivors): hold at full weight; Claudeforce is a multi-year platform contract independent of the rate cycle; Salesforce's AH +12.68% on the combination of earnings quality and the Anthropic partnership is the strongest single-stock AI-application validation of the second half
• Cash: 12–15%; deploy on a confirmed weak August NFP signal (rate-hold probability reversal) into small caps and gold; keep reserve for post-September 16 positioning

---

The Peace Discount — What the $5 Brent Oil Drop Reveals About How Markets Price Incomplete Deals

On Monday August 24, 2026, before US equity markets opened, Iran and Oman announced a "temporary joint maritime corridor" in the Strait of Hormuz. By Friday's close, Brent crude had fallen from $93.40 to $88.29 — a 5.47% decline in five trading days. The remaining $18 above the pre-conflict 2025 average of approximately $70 didn't move at all. Understanding why only $5 of a $23 war premium compressed — and why the remaining $18 refused to follow — is one of the most practically useful lessons in how commodity markets price geopolitical risk.

The anatomy of an oil war premium

When a geopolitical event threatens a major oil supply route, the price of crude doesn't simply rise by the expected reduction in physical supply. It rises by a composite of three distinct layers, each with a different persistence duration and a different compression mechanism:

The first layer is operational impairment — the actual reduction in oil throughput caused by ships physically avoiding the contested route. During the height of the 2026 Hormuz crisis, the IEA estimated 4.3 million barrels per day of impacted supply as tankers rerouted around the Cape of Good Hope or waited in Gulf anchorages. This layer compresses quickly when a shipping route becomes demonstrably safe: ships move fast, routing decisions are made daily, and a captain who sees five tankers transit without incident on Monday will have his owners authorize the same transit by Friday.

The second layer is insurance premium — the elevated war risk charges embedded in tanker charter rates and Lloyd's War Risks Pool premiums. These are contract-based, not spot-based. When Lloyd's classifies the Strait of Hormuz as a "listed area" for elevated premiums — as it has done since early March 2026 — that classification requires a formal review process to remove. The Joint War Committee, which makes these determinations, requires documented safe transit over multiple consecutive assessment periods before downgrading an area's risk classification. Even if every tanker that transits the Iran-Oman corridor this week does so without incident, the insurance premium that makes each transit approximately 12–40× more expensive than before February 28 (up from 0.25% of hull value pre-conflict to 3–10% of hull value per voyage) will not compress until the formal review occurs — which is, at minimum, several months away. The "tanker war insurance discount" (the difference between pre-crisis and current insurance costs) lives in this layer. It compresses slowly and on its own timeline regardless of what diplomacy does.

The third layer is supply uncertainty premium — the additional price embedded by commodity traders who are not modeling a specific supply reduction but are instead pricing the option value of a potential catastrophic supply disruption. This is the layer that makes oil price forecasting in geopolitical crises notoriously inaccurate: the market doesn't price what is happening; it prices what might happen. A blockade of the Strait of Hormuz — complete closure, not the 60–70% flow reduction seen in 2026's managed crisis — would remove approximately 21 million barrels per day from global supply in a market that consumes approximately 103 million barrels per day. The option value of that scenario, even at a 5% probability, adds real dollars to the spot price through the risk-neutral pricing framework that oil derivatives markets use.

Why exactly $5 compressed this week

The Iran-Oman corridor announcement directly addressed the first layer. A joint maritime corridor with agreed geographic coordinates, a joint coordination center, and a revenue-sharing framework is a concrete step toward operational route availability. Ships that were routing around the Cape of Good Hope — adding 10–14 days to Asia-to-Europe voyages — have a potential near-term alternative if the corridor becomes operational. The market priced this as a partial compression of the operational impairment layer, representing roughly 20–25% of the total war premium.

But the announcement came with an explicit conditionality — "the corridor will not fully open until the United States fulfills its commitments under the June interim peace deal" — that the market correctly identified as non-trivial. Under the Trump administration, which threatened Oman over its mediating role as recently as August 17, 2026, the timeline for US compliance with the June interim deal's commitments is undefined. The corridor exists as a diplomatic framework; it does not exist as an operational shipping lane until US political decisions activate it. The market priced the announcement as approximately one-quarter of the way to "fully operational corridor" rather than as the corridor itself — hence approximately one-quarter of the war premium compressing.

The insurance and uncertainty layers did not compress at all. Lloyd's still classifies Hormuz as elevated-risk. The Joint War Committee has not begun a formal review. The IRGC's prior public statement — that "the Hormuz reopening mechanism has its own specific mechanism and has nothing to do with negotiations" — was not rescinded this week. The option value of a complete Hormuz closure remains in the $88 Brent price because the conditions that would eliminate that option value (a permanent, US-ratified, IRGC-constrained agreement with Iranian government enforcement over kinetic activity) do not yet exist.

The historical parallel that illuminates the gap

The most instructive recent precedent for this dynamic is not a Middle East oil crisis but the 2022 Black Sea Grain Initiative. On July 22, 2022, Russia and Ukraine signed the "Istanbul Agreement" brokered by Turkey and the United Nations, creating a monitored shipping corridor for grain exports from three Ukrainian Black Sea ports. The day of the signing, wheat futures fell sharply on the announcement. But grain prices remained elevated and volatile — roughly 5–15% above pre-February 2022 levels — for several more months before fully returning to pre-war levels by end of 2022, as the market had already largely priced in the supply normalization before the formal signing. The gap persisted for three reasons that directly parallel the Hormuz situation: the Black Sea corridor required quarterly renewal by Russia (conditionality); Lloyd's War Risks Pool and cargo insurers did not immediately reclassify the Black Sea as safe because the war was ongoing (insurance tail); and the option value of a Russian withdrawal from the agreement — which ultimately occurred in July 2023 — kept a structural uncertainty premium embedded in grain prices throughout the corridor's existence (uncertainty layer).

The 2022 grain deal illustrates how a substantial share of the supply-disruption premium remained in prices even after a monitored corridor was announced. In the Hormuz case, the market has priced out only 20–25% of the war premium on week one of a conditional corridor announcement — which implies the market is appropriately cautious about a corridor that explicitly requires a US government compliance action that has no committed timeline. Given that the Black Sea corridor's Russian counterparty was ultimately less reliable (Russia withdrew in 2023), the oil market's cautious calibration on the Hormuz conditionality risk appears justified.

What the remaining $18 is waiting for

Brent at $88.29 is approximately $18 above the pre-conflict 2025 average. For the remaining $18 to compress, the market needs some combination of: the US formally fulfilling its June interim deal commitments (activating the Iran-Oman corridor's operational status); Lloyd's formally removing Hormuz from the elevated-risk classification (beginning the insurance tail compression); and the IRGC explicitly linking its kinetic restraint to the diplomatic framework (eliminating or reducing the uncertainty layer). None of these have occurred. None are imminent. The $88 oil price is not peace pricing; it is conditional-deal pricing — which is the only rational response to a deal whose activation depends on a political decision by the world's most unpredictable executive branch.

For investors in warflation_hedge and geopolitical_crisis: this week's $5 compression is real and the reduction from 12–14% to 8–10% allocation is appropriate. But the structural case for maintaining significant exposure is equally real: the remaining $18 premium will not compress automatically as a function of time; it will compress only when specific operational, insurance, and diplomatic milestones are hit. Track the Lloyd's Joint War Committee review schedule, the US diplomatic calendar on Iran sanctions, and the IRGC's public posture — not the diplomatic announcements alone, which as this week demonstrated, compress the first layer without touching the second and third.

Relevant: warflation_hedge, geopolitical_crisis, commodity_supercycle.

---

Sources:
- CNBC — Stock Market Updates August 27-28, 2026
- STL News — Overseas Markets End Week Friday Aug 28, 2026
- Wichita Liberty — July 2026 PCE Inflation Report
- Bureau of Economic Analysis — PCE July 2026
- Quartz — Q2 2026 GDP Second Estimate: Consumer Spending Revised Up
- BEA — GDP Second Estimate Q2 2026
- Yahoo Finance — US Consumer Confidence Falls in August 2026
- Conference Board — Consumer Confidence August 2026
- S&P Global — Case-Shiller Index Reports Annual Gain in June 2026
- HousingWire — Case-Shiller June 2026: Home Prices Rose Faster
- Verified Investing — Jobless Claims Week Ending August 22, 2026
- NVDA Earnings — Kiplinger: Nvidia Earnings Live Updates August 2026
- RexShares — NVIDIA Q2 FY2027: Revenue, Data Center, AI Capex
- Intellectia.ai — Nvidia Earnings August 2026: Q2 Preview and Investment Outlook
- Salesforce Investor Relations — Claudeforce: Salesforce and Anthropic Partnership
- Salesforce Press Release — Claudeforce Announcement
- Yahoo Finance — Salesforce Claudeforce Deal with Anthropic
- CNBC — Dick's Sporting Goods DKS Q2 2026 Earnings
- Motley Fool — Why Dick's Sporting Goods Stock Crashed Today
- Dick's Investor Relations — Q2 2026 Results
- 247wallst — Dollar General Advances 5% on Raised Full-Year Outlook
- Quartz — Dollar General Q2 2026 Earnings Beat, Full-Year Forecast Raised
- Yahoo Finance — Best Buy Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates as Comparable Sales Rise 4.1%
- ts2.tech — Best Buy Shares Drop 4.4% After Q2 Profit Beat Offset by Margin Pressure
- PBS NewsHour — Fed Chair Warsh signals stubborn inflation may require rate hikes in Jackson Hole speech
- Washington Post — Fed Chair Warsh, concerned about inflation, at Jackson Hole Conference
- CNBC — Kevin Warsh sharpens inflation warning at Jackson Hole
- Axios — Fed's Warsh: Interest rate increases in play if inflation doesn't fall
- NPR — Fed's Kevin Warsh warns inflation is too high at Jackson Hole
- Federal Reserve — Keynote Remarks by Chairman Warsh at the 2026 Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium
- Benzinga — Fed September Hike Odds Spike to 59% After Warsh's Jackson Hole Speech
- Al Jazeera — Iran, Oman Agree on Temporary Hormuz Route: What We Know
- Yahoo Finance — Oil Prices Tumble as Oman and Iran Make an Unexpected Move
- Bloomberg — Iran, Oman Reach Agreement on Proposed Strait of Hormuz Shipping Route
- Trading Economics — Brent Crude, WTI, Gold, Treasury Yields (August 28, 2026)
- CoinDesk — Bitcoin Price (August 28, 2026)
- Reference: agents-assemble/knowledge/premarket-research/20260822_weekly.md

---

Disclaimer

This report is produced for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. All data cited reflects information available as of the publication time noted above. Market conditions and geopolitical developments may change materially before or during the trading session. Futures and pre-market levels are indicative only and are not guaranteed opening prices. Past performance of any strategy referenced is not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.