The Lubricant That Hasn't Changed Since 1953
A meditation on WD-40, the formula that has resisted disruption for 70 years, and the cult following that produced 2,000 documented uses.
In 1953, a small chemical company in San Diego called Rocket Chemical Company was working on a formula to prevent corrosion on the outer skin of the Atlas missile, which was being developed by Convair. The chemists tried 39 different formulations before achieving the desired result on the 40th attempt. The product, called "Water Displacement, 40th formula" — abbreviated to WD-40 — was originally intended exclusively for aerospace use. By 1958, employees of Rocket Chemical were taking home small unauthorized samples to use on personal household items. The company gradually realized that the consumer market was substantial. In 1969, Rocket Chemical was renamed WD-40 Company.
By 2024, WD-40 generated approximately 590 million dollars in annual revenue. The product itself has not meaningfully changed since the 1950s. The branding has remained essentially identical. The blue-and-yellow can with the small red cap is one of the most recognizable consumer-product designs in the world. The company's stock has compounded at approximately 13 percent annually for decades.
The Formula. The exact composition of WD-40 has been a closely guarded trade secret since the 1950s. The Material Safety Data Sheet discloses general categories — petroleum distillates, aliphatic hydrocarbons, surfactants, anti-corrosion agents — but the precise ratios and additional components remain proprietary. The formula is reportedly known to only a small number of employees and is not patented (which would require disclosure). The trade-secret approach has kept the formula stable for 70 years.
The Documented Uses. The WD-40 Fan Club (an actual organization administered by the company) maintains a list of documented uses for WD-40. As of 2024, the list exceeds 2,000 entries. Common categories include lubricating squeaky hinges, removing crayon from walls, untangling fishing reels, removing chewing gum from carpet, freeing rusted nuts and bolts, cleaning grease from kitchen surfaces, removing scuff marks from floors, lubricating zipper teeth, and dozens of automotive applications. Some of the uses are unusual: removing octopus ink from divers' wetsuits, displacing moisture from electrical contacts in flooded basements, lubricating dental chairs.
The Brand Stability. What makes WD-40 unusual as a consumer-products case study is its absolute brand stability. The packaging has remained essentially unchanged for 70 years. The marketing voice has remained consistent. The retail distribution has stayed in hardware stores, automotive supply stores, and increasingly in mass-market retailers. The brand has not extended into adjacent categories — there are no WD-40 hand tools, no WD-40 house cleaners, no WD-40 motor oils. The company has maintained focus on the single product line.
This focus is unusual. Most consumer-products companies pursue brand extension aggressively. The Procter & Gamble or Unilever model is to leverage strong brands into adjacent categories with related-product marketing. WD-40 has done very little of this. The company has launched a handful of related products (a contact cleaner, a silicone lubricant), but the primary brand has remained focused on the original blue-and-yellow can.
The Financial Performance. WD-40 Company is a publicly traded micro-cap stock (WDFC). The financial performance has been remarkably consistent. Revenue has grown roughly 5-7 percent annually for decades. Operating margins have stayed in the 18-22 percent range. Free cash flow conversion is high. Dividends have been paid and increased for over 30 consecutive years. The stock has compounded at approximately 13 percent annually over 30 years — substantially better than the S&P 500.
The investor base for WD-40 is unusual. The market cap is too small for most institutional investors. The growth profile is too modest for growth-focused investors. The product is too unglamorous for ESG-focused investors. The result is an investor base of patient long-term holders who recognize the operational discipline and stability.
The Larger Lesson. What WD-40 demonstrates is that one product, executed with discipline and stability for 70 years, can produce extraordinary cumulative returns. The temptation in modern consumer-products management is to constantly innovate, extend, and reposition. The WD-40 management has resisted that temptation for seven decades. The financial result has been one of the most stable compounding stories in American small-cap retail.
There is something almost philosophical in the WD-40 story. The product has not been improved meaningfully since 1953. The branding has not been "modernized." The company has not pursued aggressive M&A or expansion strategy. It simply makes the original product, sells it through the same channels, in the same can, year after year.
The compounding from this discipline has exceeded what most marketing-and-innovation-focused consumer-products companies have achieved. The lesson, perhaps, is that durability sometimes beats reinvention.
Now go enjoy your Saturday. Whatever needs lubricating can wait.
Sources: - WD-40 Company (NASDAQ: WDFC) annual reports and 10-K filings - WD-40 Fan Club user submissions - Industry coverage: Investor's Business Daily, Wall Street Journal - Trade-secret disclosure documents (MSDS)
Disclaimer
This article is produced for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. All data cited reflects information available as of the publication time noted above. Market conditions may change materially between publication and when you read this. Past performance of any strategy referenced is not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Take-Two's $44 billion market cap is one game, one date, and a $7.4 billion hole
Take-Two Interactive sells the most anticipated product in entertainment history, and on paper it still loses money — $298.2 million of GAAP net loss in the fiscal year that just ended, sitting atop a…
National Grid books record £11.6bn capex and 78p EPS, but a £44bn debt load funds the dividend
National Grid's FY2026 scorecard reads like a defensive investor's dream: underlying operating profit up 9% to £5.7bn, underlying EPS up 8% to 78.0p, a CPIH-linked dividend bumped to 48.49p, and a £70…
Okta's growth halves to 11% while the GAAP-to-adjusted gap swallows half its profit
Okta sells trust for a living, and the market is quietly repricing how much of it remains. The identity vendor that once compounded revenue above fifty percent a year reported just eleven percent grow…
TD's Record Quarter Hides the Felony Asset Cap Strangling Its Only Growth Engine
The Toronto-Dominion Bank just printed a quarter the bulls will quote for a year — adjusted earnings of $4.2 billion, adjusted EPS of $2.38 up 21%, revenue of $16.04 billion, record Canadian retail pr…